🔗 Share this article

Apple could be required to permit competitors to operate their own app stores on Apple devices across Britain, following a decision from the competition regulator.

This would be a major shift to Apple's well-known "walled garden" where applications can only be installed from the company's App Store.

But the Competition and Markets Authority has designated both the tech giants as having "strategic market status" - indicating they have a lot of power over mobile platforms.

Regulatory Assessment

The regulator said the two companies "may be limiting innovation and competition".

But the regulator clarified it did not "find or assume wrongdoing" from the companies.

"Mobile applications generates 1.5% of the British economy and supports around four hundred thousand positions, which is why it's essential these sectors function properly for enterprises," stated a top executive from the CMA.

Around 90-100% of British smartphones operate using the two tech companies' mobile platforms, creating what the regulator calls an "effective duopoly".

According to recent analysis, 48.5% of UK mobile owners own an iPhone - which runs the iOS operating system - with the vast majority of the rest using Google's Android.

The Company's Reaction

The regulatory probe focused on how dominant Apple and Google's own applications are versus competitors - as well as their web applications and platform software.

It is unknown what changes the authority will look to request, but earlier it published guidelines outlining possible actions it could take.

These comprise mandating it to be easier for people to switch between iOS and Android devices, and for both firms to rank apps "in a fair, objective and transparent manner" in their app stores.

Apple particularly may be required to permit alternative app stores on its devices, and enable people to install apps straight from developer sites.

This would mirror a similar ruling in the European Union, which previously took action against the company for restrictive practices.

The technology firm warned the United Kingdom could face delays to getting new features - as has occurred in the European Union - which the company blames on strict rules.

For example, some Apple Intelligence features which have been launched in other parts of the world are not accessible in the European market.

"Apple faces fierce competition in every sector where we do business, and we work tirelessly to create the finest offerings, solutions and customer interface," the company said in a release.

"The UK's adoption of European regulations would weaken that, resulting in consumers with weaker privacy and safety, delayed access to new features, and a fragmented, less seamless user journey."

The Search Giant's Standpoint

Android users can presently use alternative marketplaces - though critics say they are not as user-friendly as Google's own application marketplace.

The CMA's roadmap said Google may have to "change the user experience" of downloading apps directly from websites, as well as "remove user frictions" when using third-party platforms.

"There appears to be no the justification for the current classification," a Google policy executive stated.

The representative said "the majority" of Google device owners use third-party platforms or install applications straight from a creator's site, and asserted there is a much wider selection of applications available for Android users versus those on Apple devices.

"Currently available are twenty-four thousand Android phone models from 1,300 device makers globally, facing intense competition from iOS in the UK," the spokesperson continued.

Google's platform is an freely available software, which means creators can utilize and develop on top of it for free.

Google contends this means it promotes market competition.

But consumer groups said curbs on these firms' dominance in different nations "are already helping businesses to innovate and giving customers more choice".

"Their dominance is now creating genuine problems by restricting choice for consumers and market rivalry for businesses," stated a consumer advocate.