🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an international accord created to protect females from abuse, including family violence, following extensive and intense debates in the legislature.

Several thousand of demonstrators gathered in Riga this week to oppose the decision. The final decision now lies with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to approve or veto the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to develop legal frameworks and support services to end all types of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation withdrew in 2021, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a significant setback for gender equality.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was approved by the EU in 2023, yet conservative factions have contended that its emphasis on equal rights undermines family values and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, lawmakers decided by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the treaty, a action sponsored by opposition parties but supported by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who stood with protesters outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that abuse will not prevail," she stated to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the main parties supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has called on citizens to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the agreement not to be politicized, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The Thursday's decision has provoked widespread outcry both inside the country and abroad.

22,000 individuals have endorsed a national appeal calling for the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has called a demonstration for next Thursday, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the wishes of the nation's citizens.

International Concerns and Possible Future Actions

The leader of the European organization's legislative body commented that Latvia had made a hasty choice fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and human rights in Europe".

He added that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty four years ago, instances of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not secure a two-thirds support, the head of state could possibly send back the bill for further consideration if he has objections.

President Rinkevics stated on social media that he would assess the vote according to legal principles, "taking into account governmental and judicial factors, instead of belief-based perspectives".

Recently, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a worrisome development for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout the continent," commented a human rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in several EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular safeguards for victims of gender-based violence
• The nation's vote could affect comparable discussions in additional EU countries